Report and recommendations of a Board appointed by the Bureau of Navigation regarding the instruction and training of line officers
| dc.contributor.author | Knox, Dudley W. | |
| dc.contributor.author | King, Ernest J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pye, William S. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-04-09T18:24:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-04-09T18:24:54Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1920-08 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | United States Naval Institute Proceedings (1920) 46(210):1265-1294. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10945/40344 | |
| dc.description | The "Knox-Pye-King Report", published as part of United States Naval Institute Proceedings, Vol. 46, No. 210, August, 1920. | |
| dc.description | Outline of Board Report: 1. Scheme of report. 2. Scope of consideration. Part I. Instruction (Training) of the Line Officer 3. Manifold requirements of naval profession. 4. Periodical instruction indispensable to efficiency. 5. Four phases of naval career. 6. Instruction (training) also in four phases. 7. Duration and time of training periods. 8. First period—the Naval Academy. 9. Second period—general line course. 10. Instruction and training for the duties of command. 11. Third period—junior War College course. 12. Fourth period—senior War College course. 13. Provision of necessary arrangements (time and numbers) for instruction and training. Part II. Specialization 14. Universal specialization required. 15. The "exchange" principle involved. 16. Specialists defined (delimited). 17. Specialists in design and production of material. 18. Specialists in manipulation of material. 19. Specialists for special duty only. 20. Other specialties pertaining to line requirements. 21. The officers of the staff corps (and Marine Corps). 22. Temporary exceptions from general line course. Part III. Practical Consideration 23. Initiation of recommendations. 24. General graph of employment—ensign to commander. 25. General training board. Reference: (a) Bunav. let. No. 8039-198, 16 Oct., 1919. (b) P. G. Dept. Nav. Acad. Let. No. 159, 27 Aug., 1919. (Enc. "A.") (c) Bunav. 2d End. No. 8039-198, 10 Sept., 1919. (d) Supt. War College 3d End. No. 733-2-2, 17 Sept., 1919. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.title | Report and recommendations of a Board appointed by the Bureau of Navigation regarding the instruction and training of line officers | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | Knox Pye King Board | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | Knox-Pye-King Report | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | K-P-K Report | en_US |
| dc.type | Report | en_US |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mobile training teams: a cost analysis
(Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 1994-12);In November 1990, the Navy instituted a personal financial management program to reduce lost manhours due to financial hardships. Financial hardships can be attributed in part to inadequate training in personal financial ... -
NETC Acquisition Planning Framework for Managing Training Delivery Requirements
(Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2016); N16-N213-AIn 2015, we conducted an analysis of the Science of Learning (SoL) literature to determine how the Navy might augment or modify its current practices with regard to training system development and employment to better ... -
Navy A-school academic setbacks : their cost and implications for retention and performance.
(Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 1991-06);This thesis analyzes the implications of academic setback for retention, performance, and training costs using extracts from the Enlisted Training and Tracking (TRAINTRACK) File, Special Cohort Accession and Continuer ...
