Analysis of the Field of Public Management: A Response to Kelman, Thompson, Jones, and Schedler
Candreva, Philip J.
MetadataShow full item record
This essay examines the field of public management as explicated in the dialogue between Kelman, Thompson, Jones and Schedler (2003) and others, from the perspective of the philosophy of science. While there may be wide consensus that a substantial body of information about public management exists, Kelman, Thompson, Jones and Schedler are consistent in their view that empirical generalizations and underlying principles do not exist. This assertion notwithstanding, this essay does not attempt to make sense of the theories of public management, rather it tries to make sense of public management as a separate and distinct field of scientific inquiry, and, for that purpose, the philosophy of science is useful. What follows are three views of public management looking through that philosophical lens: the origins of the discipline, the nature of the practice, and the community of scholars.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Hannes, Kevin L. (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 1992-06);In August of 1990, the CNO released a memorandum to all flag officers to bring Total Quality Leadership (TQL) to the fleet. This thesis is a case study of how an operational command goes about adopting the philosophies ...
Dubaz, Nicholas R. (Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School, 2016-06);Radicalization and political violence are traditionally explained as rational, instrumental choices motivated by grievances, deprivation, oppression, and other factors external to the individual. This explanatory model, ...
Kimiagar, Hamid (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 1974-06);The first section of this thesis is a brief review of the conventional approach to performance appraisal, and attempts to point out some evidence of its deficiencies and obsolescence. As a result of these deficiencies, ...