Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMoran, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGretz, Michael A.
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-14T17:41:03Z
dc.date.available2012-03-14T17:41:03Z
dc.date.issued2008-03
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/4204
dc.description.abstractIs it possible to defend U.S. interests in the Persian Gulf through the use of primarily SOF/light forces? How might implementing this type of force structure affect the perception of U.S. involvement in the region and its ability to project power on a scale commensurate with its interests? This thesis examines two ways that the U.S. might be able to secure its interests in the Gulf using a minimalist approach. The two methods evaluated are using sea bases in the Gulf and land bases in Djibouti in the Horn of Africa as forward staging bases for SOF operations in the Persian Gulf. The study looks at these two options in terms of costs and benefits both fiscally and physically in terms of the impact that these bases would have on the populations in the Gulf.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://archive.org/details/defendingusnatio109454204
dc.format.extentxii, 53 p. : 1 col. map ;en_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.subject.lcshTerrorismen_US
dc.subject.lcshPreventionen_US
dc.subject.lcshWeaponsen_US
dc.subject.lcshAnti-Americanismen_US
dc.titleDefending U.S. national interests in the Persian Gulf: going lighten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.secondreaderRasmussen, Maria
dc.contributor.corporateNaval Postgraduate School (U.S.)
dc.description.serviceUS Navy (USN) author.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc227344403
etd.thesisdegree.nameM.A.en_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineNational Security Affairsen_US
etd.thesisdegree.grantorNaval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
etd.verifiednoen_US
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record