Concordance of clinician judgment of mild traumatic brain injury history with a diagnostic standard
Pogoda, Terri K.
Iverson, Katherine M.
Hendricks, Ann M.
Stolzmann, Kelly L.
Charns, Martin P.
Lew, Henry L.
MetadataShow full item record
The concordance of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) clinician judgment of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) history with American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (ACRM)-based criteria was examined for Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) Veterans. In order to understand inconsistencies in agreement, we also examined the associations between evaluation outcomes and conceptually relevant patient characteristics, deployment-related events, current self-reported health symptoms, and suspected psychiatric conditions. The Veteran sample comprised 14,026 OIF/OEF VA patients with deployment-related mTBI history (n = 9,858) or no history of mTBI (n = 4,168) as defined by ACRM-based criteria. In the majority of cases (76.0%), clinician judgment was in agreement with the ACRM-based criteria. The most common inconsistency was between clinician judgment (no) and ACRM-based criteria (yes) for 21.3% of the patients. Injury etiology, current self-reported health symptoms, and suspected psychiatric conditions were additional factors associated with clinician diagnosis and ACRM-based criteria disagreement. Adherence to established diagnostic guidelines is essential for accurate determination of mTBI history and for understanding the extent to which mTBI symptoms resolve or persist over time in OIF/OEF Veterans.
The article of record as published may be located at http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.05.0115
RightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
McCarty, Robert T (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 1997-09);The Cutter Assignment Model (CAM) is an optimization based decision aid that recommends relocation of cutters to homeports in order to maximize combined benefits less relocation costs. In 1996, the Chief of Coast Guard ...
Smith, Charles E. (George Washington University, 1966-04);The purpose o£ this paper is to study the criteria used in establishing designated project management in the United States Navy, then to compare that criteria to organizational theory and industrial practice. It is hoped ...
Harrison, William Lamar (Monterey, California. U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, 1966-10);This thesis offers, to those concerned with analysis of modern weapons systems, a general methodology for devising appropriate and meaningful measures of effectiveness. This methodology does not include a specific model ...