From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing, America's Future Grand Strategy
MetadataShow full item record
The Soviet Union's collapse transformed the international system dramatically, but there has been no corresponding change in U.S. grand strategy. In terms of ambitions, interests, and alliances, the United States is following the same grand strategy it pursued from 1945 until 1991: that of preponderance.' Whether this strategy will serve U.S. interests in the early twenty-first century is problematic. Hence, in this article my purpose is to stimulate a more searching debate about future U.S. grand strategic options.2 To accomplish this, I compare the strategy of preponderance to a proposed alternative grand strategy: offshore balancing.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Bardin, Jeremy; Covelli, Dan; Malvasio, James; Olson, Matt; Speer, Daniel; Orion Team Consulting (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2010-09);EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Persistent Maritime Unmanned Aircraft Systems Program Office (PMA-262) has an expected initial operational capability (IOC) in FY2014 for the Broad Area Maritime Surveillance Unmanned Aerial System ...
Thompson, Laura Jean. (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2011-09);The U.S. maritime domain includes vast resources and enables transportation of goods and services across the globe. Similar to all critical infrastructures and key resources, the maritime domain can be exploited to cause ...
Guttieri, Karen; Brutzman, Don (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2009); NPS-CI-2009-1Globalization, despite its many positive attributes, also brings complex security challenges. Climate change, pandemics, energy and food scarcity, and trans-national terrorism compel us to think about security in a new ...