Joint Campaign Analysis Book 1 - Student Text
JCABook1.pdf (958.7Kb)Abstract
This course was originally developed in 1980 while I was in the Chair of Applied Systems
Analysis at the Naval Postgraduate School. It was based on campaign analyses typical among
Navy Pentagon planners and CINC staffs. As one project, students were required to report on and
evaluate individual classified studies in the library for each other. As these studies faded in
relevance there were few replacements, because in the early 1980s the Navy closed down its
campaign analysis machinery for a decade. But decision-makers hungered for some sort of
appraisals. Strategic war gaming was substituted and is still a prominent, overworked tool for
campaign and force level planning. The lost art of campaign analysis was revived in the 1990s,
but often over- emphasizes high fidelity or comprehensive simulation. OA4602
Description
Part III includes:
A. Conner, Ehlers & Marshall: “Countering Short Range Ballistic Missiles,” 1992
B. Ravid:“Defense Before or After Bomb-release Line,”1989
C. Young: “Setting Goals for a Submarine Campaign,” 1985
D. Vlahos: “Wargaming: An Enforcer of Strategic Realities,” 1987
E. CSIS: “Gulf War: Military Lessons Learned,” July 1991
F. USACAA: “Historical Characteristics of Combat for Wargames [BENCHMARKS],” 1988
G. Case, Hines & Satchwell: “Analysis of Air Ops During Desert Shield/Desert Storm,” 1992
H. Appleget, Jeff: “The Combat Simulation of Desert Storm,” 1995
I. Hall: “A Littoral Supremacy Ship,” point paper of Oct 1993
J. Arquilla & Fredricksen, “‘Graphing’ and Optimal Grand Strategy”
K. Bubke, “Clausewitz and Naval Warfare”
L. Hughes, “Naval Maneuver Warfare”
M. Ravid: “Military Decision, Game Theory and Intelligence: An Anecdote,” 1989
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Some planning considerations for joint operations in a maritime theater
(Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 1989-09);There are numerous interrelationships between joint operations, maritime theaters, operational or campaign planning, and combat. This thesis is an analysis of the British Turkish campaign of 1915, the German Norwegian ... -
Campaign analysis of a NATO ground forces campaign in Kosovo
(Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2000);On March 24, 1999, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) started an air campaign by attacking targets in Serbia, including Kosovo. This thesis analyzes the question: "What might have happened if Serbia had not ... -
Demand the Advantage. When Is Airpower Central to a Campaign?.
(2002);The purpose of this study is to provide joint planners with a means to determine when airpower should be the central element of a campaign. Additionally, this study can help planners understand not only when airpower should ...
