Intelligence reform in new democracies: factors supporting or arresting progress
Matei, Florina Cristiana
MetadataShow full item record
This article examines an important (and most problematic) component of the democratic civil–military relations (CMR) concept (understood in terms of democratic control, effectiveness, and efficiency of the armed forces, police forces, and intelligence agencies). It focuses (1) on the democratization of intelligence, that is finding a proper balance between intelligence effectiveness and transparency, and (2) on what particular factors support or arrest progress in the democratization of intelligence. The article provides supporting examples from Brazil and Romania, two developing democracies that have been undergoing major reforms of their intelligence systems for almost 20 years, in terms of both transparency and effectiveness.
The article of record as published may be located at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.586257
RightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Matei, Florina Cristiana (Routledge/Taylor & Francis, 2014);In their path toward democratic consolidation, emerging democracies endeavor to ensure the democratic transfer of political power, bring changes in the legal framework, transform their executive, legislative, and judicial ...
Matei, Florina Cristiana; Xharo, Mimoza; Bala, Eduart (Taylor & Francis, 2016);Albania’s intelligence transformation began in earnest after the end of the Cold War and the country’s transition to democracy in1991. In general, democratic reform of intelligence is an onerous and taxing process, given ...
Filip, Valentin F. (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2006-03);In the post-Cold War era, two major trends illustrate the evolution of the international security environment: the spread of democracies and the emergence of asymmetric threats. The former focuses on freedom, the latter ...