Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBruneau, Thomas C.
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-09T18:03:04Z
dc.date.available2014-09-09T18:03:04Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationLatin American Politics and Society, Volume 55, Number 4, 2013.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/43282
dc.descriptionThe article of record as published may be located at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2013.00216.xen_US
dc.description.abstractThis article argues that civil-military relations should be conceptualized not only in terms of democratic civilian control but also for effectiveness in implementing a spectrum of roles and missions. It also argues that achieving effectiveness requires institutional development as a necessary but not sufficient condition. Currently in Latin America, the focus in civil-military relations remains exclusively on civilian control. While there is a growing awareness of the need for analysis beyond asserting control over the armed forces, so far nobody has proposed or adopted a broader analytical framework. This article proposes such a framework, and employs it to analyze differences among four major South American countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Colombia. The explanation for the differences identified by use of the framework is found in the incentives of civilian elites in Chile and Colombia, who have recognized serious threats to national security and defense.en_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.en_US
dc.titleCivilians and the Military in Latin America: The Absence of Incentivesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.corporateNaval Postgraduate School (U.S.) Monterey, California
dc.contributor.departmentNational Security Affairs (NSA)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record