Hiding in Plain Sight: Denial, Deception, and the Non-State Actor
Wirtz, James J.
MetadataShow full item record
History is replete with examples of militaries that have used denial and deception to gain victory on the battlefield. Denial withholds accurate information from an adversary, while deception puts forward misleading information that conforms to the expectations of an opponent. Recently, the advent of the information age has allowed small non-state actors, particularly terrorist organizations, to engage in denial and deception—with often devastating results. Unfortunately, states have been slow to adjust, which has allowed terrorist groups to carry out their attacks while hiding in plain sight of their targets.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Godson, Roy; Wirtz, James J. (2000);A concern about the threat of high-level denial and deception has waxed and waned among Americans since the end of World War II. Sometimes they fear that denial and deception has shaped threat assessments: witness the 1976 ...
Rowe, Neil C. (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2008);We examine the main ethical issues concerning deception in cyberspace. We first discuss the concept of deception and survey ethical theories applicable to cyberspace. We then examine deception for commercial gain such as ...
Rowe, Neil C. (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2007-05);We explore a new approach to defense of computer systems, deliberately deceiving attackers as to resource availability. This can be more effective than outright denial of access because it encourages an attacker to waste ...