Real options in military system acquisition: the case study of technology development for the Javelin anti-tank weapon system
Ford, David N.
MetadataShow full item record
Three different technologies were considered in the technology development phase of the Javelin anti-tank missile system: a laser-beam riding system, a fiberoptic system, and a forward looking infrared system. The Army awarded three “Proof of Principle” contracts to three competing contractor teams to develop and conduct a “fly-off” technology competition. The current work analyzed the three alternatives using measures of effectiveness (MOE) to combine performance across nine acquisition objectives. These MOEs were compared with development and procurement cost estimates. No alternative dominated. Marginal benefits analysis was next used to define the trade–off space among the alternatives. Differences in the likelihood of successful development of the alternatives were evaluated, resulting in one technology appearing to dominate. However, the acquisition approach created a real option for the best alternative that could differentially add value to the alternatives. A real options model was used to analyze the value provided by investing in this competitive option. Results indicate the Army paid less than the total value of the three options, but could have increased net savings by paying different amounts to test each alternative. The analysis method provides a logical and defendable approach to the analysis of alternatives during technology development uncertainty.
Acquisition Research Case Study
RightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
NPS Report NumberNPS-AM-13-013
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Real Options Analysis for Acquisition of New Technology: A Case Study of Korea K2 Tank's Powerpack Kim, Sungchul; Giachetti, Ronald; Park, Sangsung (MDPI, 2018);For sustainable defense management, it is essential to acquire weapons systems that can adapt to future uncertain threats and, at the same time, to invest efficiently with limited budgets. Economic analysis is used to ...
Sauser, Brian; Ramirez-Marquez, Jose; Tan, Weiping (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2011-04-30); NPS-AM-11-C8P09R02-040Most systems now provide multiple functions and multiple capabilities (MFMC) in a single solution. Yet, it has become increasingly challenging for managers to properly assess the development and acquisition of these systems ...
Mane, Muharrem; DeLaurentis, Daniel (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2011-04-30); NPS-AM-11-C8P19R01-066Capability-based acquisition has led to the simultaneous development of systems that must eventually interact within a system-of-systems (or major sub-systems that must integrate on a single platform). The necessary ...