Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAngelis, Diana
dc.contributor.authorFord, David N.
dc.contributor.authorDillard, John
dc.dateAugust 22, 2013
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-08T16:56:24Z
dc.date.available2015-09-08T16:56:24Z
dc.date.issued2013-08-22
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/46425
dc.descriptionApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.en_US
dc.descriptionAcquisition Research Case Studyen_US
dc.description.abstractThree different technologies were considered in the technology development phase of the Javelin anti-tank missile system: a laser-beam riding system, a fiberoptic system, and a forward looking infrared system. The Army awarded three “Proof of Principle” contracts to three competing contractor teams to develop and conduct a “fly-off” technology competition. The current work analyzed the three alternatives using measures of effectiveness (MOE) to combine performance across nine acquisition objectives. These MOEs were compared with development and procurement cost estimates. No alternative dominated. Marginal benefits analysis was next used to define the trade–off space among the alternatives. Differences in the likelihood of successful development of the alternatives were evaluated, resulting in one technology appearing to dominate. However, the acquisition approach created a real option for the best alternative that could differentially add value to the alternatives. A real options model was used to analyze the value provided by investing in this competitive option. Results indicate the Army paid less than the total value of the three options, but could have increased net savings by paying different amounts to test each alternative. The analysis method provides a logical and defendable approach to the analysis of alternatives during technology development uncertainty.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNaval Postgraduate School Acquisition Research Programen_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.en_US
dc.titleReal options in military system acquisition: the case study of technology development for the Javelin anti-tank weapon systemen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.contributor.departmentAcquisition Management
dc.subject.authorReal Optionsen_US
dc.subject.authorAnalysis of Alternativesen_US
dc.subject.authorTechnology Developmenten_US
dc.subject.authorJavelinen_US
dc.identifier.npsreportNPS-AM-13-013
dc.identifier.npsreportNPS-AM-13-013en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record