Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorNussbaum, Daniel A.
dc.contributor.authorRoscoe, Scott A.
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-14T17:44:20Z
dc.date.available2012-03-14T17:44:20Z
dc.date.issued2010-09
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/5135
dc.descriptionApproved for public release; distribution is unlimiteden_US
dc.description.abstractL) FBCF Calculator is performed and identifies the similarities and differences between the methodologies to include an analysis of the output of each calculator. Our analysis indicates that while the methodologies used to calculate the FBCF vary among the Services, they share common underlying principles and the FBCF methodologies can produce similar results. Recommendations for follow on studies are provided.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://archive.org/details/acomparisonofful109455135
dc.format.extentxviii, 69 p. ;en_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted.en_US
dc.subject.lcshOperations researchen_US
dc.subject.lcshManagementen_US
dc.subject.lcshManpoweren_US
dc.titleA comparison of the fully burdened cost of fuel methodologies used across the Department of Defenseen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.secondreaderBurton, Douglas R.
dc.contributor.corporateNaval Postgraduate School (U.S.)
dc.contributor.departmentOperations Research
dc.description.funderOPNAV N81en_US
dc.description.recognitionOutstanding Thesisen_US
dc.description.serviceUS Navy (USN) authoren_US
dc.identifier.oclc671488647
etd.thesisdegree.nameM.S.en_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineOperations Researchen_US
etd.thesisdegree.grantorNaval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
etd.verifiednoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record