Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHalladay, Carolyn
dc.contributor.advisorLewis, Ted
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Hoaithi Y.T.
dc.dateMar-17
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-10T16:31:56Z
dc.date.available2017-05-10T16:31:56Z
dc.date.issued2017-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/53024
dc.descriptionApproved for public release; distribution is unlimiteden_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the ongoing debate between law enforcement and the intelligence communities on one side, and the technology industry and privacy rights groups on the other, over the going dark problem. Going dark is a phenomenon created by ubiquitous use of end-to-end encryption over communication devices and Internet platforms, rendering those communications warrant-proof. End-to-end encryption means that only the sender and receiver of the message can read it, and no one in between. Even with a properly executed warrant or subpoena, law enforcement and intelligence agencies are unable to access the data they need because that data was encrypted. This thesis explores the historical, political and legislative developments that contributed to the rise of encryption in recent years, as well as constitutional doctrines that may be relevant to the public debate over possible policy solutions. Through the policy options analysis method, this thesis identifies lawful hacking as a middle-ground solution that policymakers should adopt in the short term. It also recommends that the U.S. government initiate a public education campaign to gain public support for some form of regulation concerning encryption in the future. The fundamental issue here is not only about the tension between privacy and security. The issue is also about who should make decisions with broad implications for the collective security: elected officials or the technology industry.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://archive.org/details/lawfulhackingtow1094553024
dc.publisherMonterey, California: Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.rightsCopyright is reserved by the copyright owner.en_US
dc.titleLawful hacking: toward a middle-ground solution to the going dark problemen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHomeland Security
dc.subject.authorgoing darken_US
dc.subject.authorend-to-end encryptionen_US
dc.subject.authorubiquitous encryptionen_US
dc.subject.authorCALEAen_US
dc.subject.authorlawful hackingen_US
dc.subject.authorprivacy versus securityen_US
dc.subject.authorliberty versus securityen_US
dc.subject.authorwarrant proof communicationsen_US
dc.subject.authorencryption code and the Fourth Amendmenten_US
dc.subject.authorencryption code and the First Amendmenten_US
dc.description.recognitionOutstanding Thesis
dc.description.serviceAttorney-Advisor, Office of Chief Counsel, Transportation Security Administrationen_US
etd.thesisdegree.nameMaster of Arts in Security Studies (Homeland Security and Defense)en_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineSecurity Studies (Homeland Security and Defense)en_US
etd.thesisdegree.grantorNaval Postgraduate Schoolen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record