Strategic usefulness of conventional force/special operations force interdependence in irregular warfare
King, Eric D.
White, Matthew R.
MetadataShow full item record
Over the past 15 years, the United States has been involved in many irregular conflicts worldwide. The most prominent of these conflicts occurred in Iraq and Afghanistan, where both conventional forces (CF) and special operations forces (SOF) were deployed on a large scale. As the United States attempted to figure out how to deal with these insurgencies and irregular threats, CF and SOF were often interdependent with one another. These interdependent operations often had tactical success, but strategic gains have proved elusive and it is unclear what effect these actions have had on SOF and their ability to counter irregular threats. Other conflicts, such as Operation Enduring Freedom-Philippines (OEF-P), only saw the employment of SOF to counter the irregular threats. This independent operation allowed SOF to remain flexible and bolster the Philippine government through an indirect approach. While interdependence is being applauded by both CF and SOF leaders from experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan, this thesis suggests that SOF may gain the greatest strategic utility in irregular wars when operating independently against irregular threats.
RightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Statistical analysis of warfare: identification of winning factors with a focus on irregular warfare Gondal, Bilal S. (Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School, 2015-09);The purpose of this study was to determine important factors in winning conventional and irregular conflict. The research sought to identify variables and trends for conventional and irregular warfare as a means for ...
Hindert, Johann (Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School, 2015-06);Increasingly, so-called weak actors employ irregular warfare to successfully challenge the strong. The British, French, and Americans are recognized for their irregular warfare experience, but the comparatively rich German ...
Santa, Gabor (Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School, 2014-06);From small countries’ perspectives, the four general defensive postures—conventional military build-ups, WMD acquisition, alliance formation, and neutrality—are not always viable choices, and are often unaffordable. So ...