Can NATO's "new" allies and key partners exercise national-level command in crisis and war?
MetadataShow full item record
This article posits that most postcommunist members of NATO and key partners continue the practice of using communist concepts of command at the national level of governance. These concepts include the hyper-centralization of decision making, collective decision making, and of most concern, unclear chains of command and alignment of authority with responsibility. Combined, these concepts have the potential for inhibiting the timely and clear command of a nation’s armedforces, let alone their effective assimilation into the alliance’s integrated command structure. Such an eventuality has clearly negative implications for the alliance generally, but these weaknesses also could have the unexpected consequence of compromising “new” allies’ national sovereignty in crisis and war.
The article of record as published may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2018.1419711
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Kumar, Rakesh (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2006-09);The aim of the thesis is to analyze India's nuclear weapons command and control system as it has evolved since the nation's 1998 nuclear weapons tests. The small size of India's nuclear weapons arsenal does not imply that ...
Berg, Scott A. (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 1990-03);This thesis contains material for the course, Introduction to Command, Control and Communications (C3). The first part of the thesis describes selected principles and concepts of C3 related to communication management, ...
Weller, David B. (Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2004-03);The United States is embarking on a course of designing and fielding a Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) to protect the US and her citizenry against ballistic missile attacks. The BMDS will need a Command and Control, ...