MEMS acoustic directional finder for small flying UAS [video]

View/ Open
Download
Author
Alves, Fabio
Karunasiri, Gamani
Date
2018-04-18Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
When compared with the electromagnetic counterparts, acoustic sensors have many advantages that include non-line-of-sight, passive, low-cost, and low power, weight, and size. Acoustic sensors are the primary sensors employed in most unattended ground sensor systems because they can provide detection, direction finding, classification, tracking, and accurate cueing of other high-resolution sensors. The ability to detect and localize aerial UAS with acoustic sensors is not straightforward and require a sensor that can filter out intense background noise and spectral bands not related to the intrinsic acoustic signature of the source. In addition, highly accurate directionality is required. Our team is developing bio-inspired acoustic MEMS sensors to perform this specific task. In order to accomplish that it is necessary to understand the acoustic signature of the target. Typically, the acoustic spectrum of a quadcopter in hovering regime is dominated by high and sustained tone noise at the blade passing frequency and shaft rate and their harmonics up to the mid frequency range of hearing. Broadband noise in the spectra become dominant in the mid and high frequency ranges indicating that rotor self-noise could be significant part of the system noise. Variations in the acoustic spectra of different rotor-sets at the same thrust are significant around the mid and high frequencies at which the broadband component dominates. However between 600 and 1300 Hz some spectral features seem to be perennial (independent of flight regime, payload, etc.). In a realistic operational environment, topography, landmarks, obstacles, weather and different fight regimes influences must be added to the intrinsic signature. In this context, the 18th JIFX was instrumental to provide a variety of environmental and topographical conditions as well as different platforms to be analyzed. Acoustic signatures of 8 different UAS were recorded so far and preliminary observation of the data show that indeed very strong narrow spectral features were located between 600 and 1300 Hz, as shown in Figure 1, for a Yuneec Typhoon 600 Hexacopter. These spectral characteristics will be used as design requirements for the MEMS sensor, whose resonant response is ideal for increasing the sensitivity (10 to 1000 times better than convectional microphones) and naturally filter out the undesirable acoustic spectral bands for enhancing the detection capabilities.
Description
CRUSER TechCon 2018 Research at NPS. Wednesday 1: Sensing
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
MEMS acoustic directional finder for small flying UAS
Alves, Fabio; Karunasiri, Gamani (2018-04-18);When compared with the electromagnetic counterparts, acoustic sensors have many advantages that include non-line-of-sight, passive, low-cost, and low power, weight, and size. Acoustic sensors are the primary sensors employed ... -
Evaluation of matched-field processing techniques using simulated acoustic vector sensor data
Hsu, Yu-Chih. (Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2005-12);There has recently been growing interest in the use of acoustic particle velocity measurements for sonar system applications such as source localization. It is expected that acoustic particle velocity sensors or "vector" ... -
Intelligent Recognition of Acoustic and Vibration Threats for Security Breach Detection, Close Proximity Danger Identification, and Perimeter Protection
Dibazar, Alireza, A.; Yousefi, Ali; Park, Hyung O.; Lu, Bing; Sageev, George; Berger, Theodore W. Berger (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate SchoolCenter for Homeland Defense and Security, 2011-03-00);The protection of perimeters in national, agricultural, airport, prison, and military sites, and residential areas against dangerous approaching human and vehicles when using human agents to provide security is expensive ...