Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRendon, Rene
dc.contributor.advisorLandale, Karen
dc.contributor.authorWalls, Clint
dc.contributor.authorMurrow, Michael
dc.contributor.authorLamoureux, Jacques
dc.contributor.otherAcquisition Research Program
dc.date4/27/2017
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-05T21:36:49Z
dc.date.available2018-06-05T21:36:49Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-27
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/58403
dc.descriptionStudent Research Poster Showen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of our research was to identify key relationships between the source selection methods of tradeoff and lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) to the contract outcomes of procurement administrative lead times (PALT) and contractor performance assessment reporting system (CPARS) ratings. Statistical analysis of our data set provided the empirical evidence of these relationships.en_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.en_US
dc.titleRelationship of Source Selection Methods to Contract Outcomes: An Analysis of Air Force Source Selectionen_US
dc.typePosteren_US
dc.contributor.corporateNaval Postgraduate School (U.S.)en_US
dc.contributor.corporateNaval Postgraduate School (U.S.)
dc.description.serviceClint Walls, CPT, USAF
dc.description.serviceMichael Murrow, CPT, USAF
dc.description.serviceJacques Lamoureux, CPT, USAF
dc.identifier.npsreportSYM-AM-17-190


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record