Terrorism and the Fourth Wave in Deterrence Research
MetadataShow full item record
After 9/11, many people claimed these attacks showed that deterrence does not work against terrorism. Scholars have responded to this challenge by considering how deterrence might be used to prevent terrorism. This literature review identifies areas of consensus and disagreement in the recent research as well as remaining weaknesses. There is surprising consensus that deterrence remains potentially relevant, along with recognition that it will not be 100 percent effective. Three approaches have received the greatest attention: indirect deterrence, deterrence by denial, and deterrence by delegitimization. The area of greatest disagreement concerns threatening retaliation against the societies terrorists claim to represent. Finally, two areas where more work is needed are greater empirical research to test the ideas put forward so far and more attention to trade-offs involved in the various proposals.
Paper prepared for International Studies Association annual meeting, New Orleans, LA, February 17-20, 2010.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Deterrence and the United States Coast Guard: enhancing current practice with performance measures Palin, Philip; Hall, Steven; Lewis, Ted; Baldwin, Craig (2012-03); UDI# 1181Deterrence displaces or delays unwanted behavior. More ambitiously, deterrence aims to permanently discourage an individual or individuals from such behavior. It operates through the prospect of pain or pleasure. Fear ...
Knopf, Jeffrey (2008-03);This paper proposes a broader concept of deterrence than has been standard in the security studies field. It analyzes the past history of debates about deterrence to show that, despite recent doubts about deterrence, the ...
Rekasius, Mindaugas. (Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2005-06);This thesis examines a largely unexplored area of deterrence theory: unconventional deterrence. Unconventional deterrence is defined herein as "persuading the opponent not to attack, via threats of unconventional warfare, ...