Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEger, Robert J. III
dc.contributor.authorMendieta, Maximilliano G.
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-02T20:04:49Z
dc.date.available2018-08-02T20:04:49Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationEger III, Robert J., and Maximiliano G. Mendieta. "Increasing Competition: Measuring the Impact of Policy Prescription in Hospice Provision." The American Review of Public Administration (2016): 0275074016682868.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/59367
dc.descriptionThe article of record as published may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/027507h4t0tp1s6:/6/d8o2i.8o6rg8
dc.description.abstractThis study sheds light on the effects of policies that introduce competition into the marketplace of the provision of government services. The outcomes indicate that both nonprofit and government market share in a state are negatively affected by for-profit entry, a substitution relationship. The framing of the article in the New Public Management era and the Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 provides context in which to assess the policy consequences in hospice care. Given the budgetary challenges and growing cost of health care, this analysis begins a discussion of the effects of for-profit entry into the provision of government services,providing a glimpse into what the future holds for hospice care in the reforms of the AffordableCare Act (ACA) of 2010.
dc.publisherSage
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.en_US
dc.titleIncreasing Competition: Measuring the Impact of Policy Prescription in Hospice Provisionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentBusiness & Public Policy (GSBPP)
dc.subject.authorhospice care
dc.subject.authororganizational substitution
dc.subject.authorpolicy implications


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record