The early evolution of the foundations for behavioral organization theory and strategy
MetadataShow full item record
While the field(s) of management theory and the history of modern ideas in management, business education and organizations have many different intellectual roots, the Carnegie Mellon Behavioral trio (James March, Herbert Simon and Richard Cyert) who founded the behavioral perspective on organizations stand out not just for their collective contribution to founding the field of organizational behavior as we know it today, but also for their subsequent individual contributions to the field. Organizations and Behavioral Theory of the Firm set the stage for several subsequent developments in organization and management theory including research on learning, strategic manage- ment, organizational economics and organizational routines (Gibbons, 2003; Pierce, Boerner & Teece, 2002; Williamson, 2002, 2004; Augier & Teece, 2005, 2009). In addition to providing some background on the Carnegie work, this paper traces the genealogy and development of some of the work of the founding fathers, and making the points that (1) while the work of Herbert Simon crossed disciplinary boundaries, he saw himself as doing only one thing, working in understanding limited rationality in decision making and (2) the work of James March shaped the field in a co-evolutionary way since he has been influenced too by the developments in organization studies.
The article of record as published may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2012.11.005
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Augier, Mie (2013);This paper is a discussion of “behavioral theory of the firm”. It focuses on understanding aspects of the pre-history, the context, the reception and the evolution of some of the main ideas found in “behavioral theory of ...
Command and control in virtual environments: using contingency theory to understand organization in virtual worlds Nissen, Mark E. (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2010); NPS-IS-10-005Organization Contingency Theory has served us well for more than half a century. It enjoys abundant empirical support and guides organizational design and change across a broad diversity of contingencies, in terms of ...
Dynamic fit and misfit through organizational design conceptualization via stability and maneuverability Nissen, Mark E. (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2009-06); NPS-46-09-001Fit represents a central concept for organizational Contingency Theory, but most research maintains a static focus, neglecting that contingencies—and hence the corresponding organizational designs required for fit—are ...