Real Options Analysis for Acquisition of New Technology: A Case Study of Korea K2 Tank's Powerpack

Download
Author
Kim, Sungchul
Giachetti, Ronald
Park, Sangsung
Date
2018Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
For sustainable defense management, it is essential to acquire weapons systems that can adapt to future uncertain threats and, at the same time, to invest efficiently with limited budgets. Economic analysis is used to examine the costs, benefits and uncertainties of alternatives. In particular, the use of the real options valuation, which is one of the methodologies of economic analysis, is expanding. The real options valuation has shown effectiveness across various industries to evaluate investment strategies. In this paper, we apply the real options valuation to the weapon systems development case and confirm its usefulness. Unlike previous studies, the real option valuation methodology is applied retroactively to the finished project, compared to existing research mainly applying real options to value research and development (R&D) without knowing how the project completed. We use the following procedure. (1) Define the uncertainties of the three acquisition alternatives (development, technology adoption, and purchase). (2) Calculate the benefits of the three acquisition alternatives with expected and actual data without uncertainties. (3) Model the decision tree without options and with options. (4) Analyze and compare results with benefit and benefit cost ratio. We analyzed the Korea K2 tank powerpack development case by applying real options. We could see that the real options could have reduced the risk of losses when the development risk is high and market uncertainty exists. From the case study of the development of the powerpack, we learned the following three lessons. First, we reaffirmed the importance of objective value analysis in project decision making. Second, we need to analyze the project value continuously and revise the acquisition strategy accordingly. Third, the effectiveness of the real options valuation was confirmed for sustainable defense management. In addition, the real option analysis data acquired from similar finished projects can be useful for establishing a new product acquisition strategy and, at every decision-making phase, the real option evaluation should be continuously performed with updated information. In this paper, we first perform real option valuation of finished weapon systems in the Korean defense field. This paper is valuable in establishing a rational methodology for applying economic analysis to weapon system acquisition projects.
Description
The article of record as published may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10113866
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Managerial Real Options Practice in Large System Acquisition: Empirical Descriptions and Comparison with Theory
Ford, David N.; Wu, Yanzhen (2005-05-01); NPS-PM-05-057Effective and efficient development of large complex acquisition projects requires proactive management of uncertainties to meet performance, schedule, and cost targets. Flexibility in the form of real options can be an ... -
Real options in defense R&D: a decision tree analysis approach for options to defer, abandon, and expand
Celiktas, Mehmet (Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School, 2016-12);The purpose of this thesis is to demonstrate the benefits of using real options in defense research and development (R&D) projects. To this end, the primary research question, how can real options be used in defense R&D?, ... -
Technical Data as a Service (TDaaS) and the Valuation of Data Options
Thompson, George E.; McGrath, Michael (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2019-06-17); ANS-LM-19-175Technical data allow the Department of Defense to sustain the systems it acquires and provide flexibility for future acquisitions; however, acquiring these data is challenging. Current DoD policy requires program managers ...