Army camouflage: You can't kill what you can’t see
Mortlock, Robert (Bob) F.
MetadataShow full item record
This combat uniform camouflage case study encourages critical analysis of a U.S. Army project at a decision point. The case focuses on the decision to change the camouflage pattern on combat uniforms and equipment for U.S. Army soldiers. The combat uniform case study reinforces critical thinking in uncertain environments, documents lessons learned for project management for future application, and provides wide private-sector exposure to the complexities of public-sector acquisition and the balance of testing results and affordability considerations in decision-making.
Note: Teacher’s Note: Army camouflage: you can't kill what you can’t see. International Journal of Instructional Cases (IJIC), Vol 3, 1-38 is available online at www.ijicases.com.
RightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Hutchins, Susan G.; Morrison, Jeffrey G.; Kelly, Richard T. (1996);The Tactical Decision Making Under Stress (TADMUS) program is being conducted to apply recent developments in decision theory and human-system interaction technology to the design of a decision support system for ...
Gaines, Geoffrey C. (Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School, 2014-03);Information is the single most important part of the decision-making process. There are many theories and models of decision-making processes that apply to general decisions and others that are for very specific purposes. ...
Jacobs, Patricia A. (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 1998); NPS-OR-98-003This report supplies references and comments on literature that identifies human factors influencing decision making, particularly military decision making. The literature has been classified as follows (the ...