Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLuqi||Shing, M.
dc.contributor.authorPuett, J.
dc.contributor.authorBerzins, V.
dc.contributor.authorGuan, Z.
dc.contributor.authorQiao, Y.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, L.
dc.contributor.authorChaki, N.
dc.contributor.authorLiang, X.
dc.contributor.authorRay, W.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, M.
dc.contributor.authorFloodeen, D.
dc.dateJune 9-11, 2003
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-12T21:12:31Z
dc.date.available2020-02-12T21:12:31Z
dc.date.issued2003-06-25
dc.identifier.citationLuqi et al., "Comparative rapid prototyping: a case study," 14th IEEE International Workshop on Rapid Systems Prototyping, 2003. Proceedings., San Diego, CA, USA, 2003, pp. 210-217.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/63977
dc.descriptionConference paper presented at the 14th IEEE International Workshop on Rapid Systems Prototyping (RSP’03)||The article of record as published may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IWRSP.2003.1207050en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a case study that explores the effectiveness of parallel conceptualization efforts to expose potential requirements issues in rapid prototyping. The case study consists of developing and comparing five design alternatives to model the safety-critical computer assisted resuscitation algorithm (CARA) software for a casualty intravenous fluid infusion pump using a set of computer aided Software Engineering Automated Tools (SEATools). The prototyping effort showed that users can efficiently create / modify multiple parallel models and reason about their complexity using SEATools. The study also illustrates the usefulness of comparative rapid prototyping to identifying strengths and weaknesses of alternative designs,improving the final result. The case study also exposed numerous omissions and discrepancies in the requirements document and highlighted useful future enhancements for SEATools.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipU.S. Army Research Officeen_US
dc.format.extent8 p.en_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.en_US
dc.titleComparative Rapid Prototyping, A Case Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentComputer Science (CS)en_US
dc.description.funder40473-MA-SPen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record