Predicting Federal Contractor Misconduct
Loading...
Authors
Alford, Laura C.
Hansen, Stephen C.
Hermis, Judith M.
Subjects
Advisors
Date of Issue
2021-04
Date
Publisher
Language
Abstract
Each year, the United States Federal government procures goods and services in an
amount that exceeds three percent of the nation's gross domestic product. Federal acquisitions
are subject to binding legislative guidance, including the expansive Federal Acquisition
Regulations and agency-specific supplements. In addition, contracting firms face oversight from
a variety of executive sub-agencies, all of whom monitor ongoing and ex post performance.
Uncle Sam enjoys virtually unlimited power to reclaim previously disbursed revenues, to debar
(or ban) misbehaving contractors from future government business, and to imprison and fine
contracting miscreants. Despite the unique nature of the business environment and the monetary
importance of Federal contracting, prior literature generally ignores the determinants of
contractor misconduct. Whether and to what extent firm characteristics predict a range of
misbehavior, covering a span from minor statutory violations to fraud commission, is the subject
of this paper. We exploit a hybrid research design that combines both within- and between sample elements and document a consistent association between certain contractor characteristics
and misconduct commission and severity. We also find that artifacts of the awarding agency
display a predictable relationship with contractor misconduct, underscoring the complex
institutional setting in which contractor deviancy occurs.
Type
Preprint
Description
Preliminary draft. Please do not cite without author permission.
Series/Report No
Department
Graduate School of Defense Management (GSDM)
Organization
Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.)
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funder
Format
42 p.