Investigation of Leading Indicators for Systems Engineering Effectiveness in Model-Centric Programs
Abstract
This technical report summarizes the research conducted by Massachusetts Institute of Technology under contract award HQ0034-19-1-0002 during July 22, 2019 – August 31, 2021. Involved research team members include: Dr. Donna H. Rhodes, Principal Investigator; Dr. Eric Rebentisch, Research Associate; and Mr. Allen Moulton, Research Scientist. Systems engineering practice is evolving under the digital engineering paradigm, including use of model-based systems engineering and newer approaches such as agile. This drives a need to re-examine the existing use of metrics and leading indicators. Early engineering metrics were primarily lagging measures, whereas more recent leading indicators draw on trend information to provide more predictive analysis of technical and programmatic performance of the engineering effort. The existing systems engineering leading indicators were developed under the assumption of paper-based (traditional) systems engineering practice. This research investigates the model-based implications relevant to the existing leading indicators. It aims to support program leaders, transitioning to model-based engineering on their programs, in continued use of leading indicators. It provides guiding insights for how current leading indicators can be adapted for model-based engineering. The study elicited knowledge from subject matter experts and performed literature review in identifying these implications. An illustrative case was used to investigate how four leading indicators could be generated directly from a model-based toolset. Several recommendations for future research are proposed extending from the study. A companion research study (“phase 2”) under contract HQ0034-20-1-0008 provides insights for the art of the possible for future systems engineering leading indicators and their use in decision-making on model-centric programs. For completeness, selected background information and illustrative case are included in the technical reports in both studies. This research aims to provide insights for current practice within programs transforming to digital engineering, for continued use of systems engineering leading indicators. Several recommendations for future research are proposed extending from results of the study.
Description
Acquisition Research Program Sponsored Report Series
Sponsored Acquisition Research & Technical Reports
Rights
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.NPS Report Number
MIT-SE-21-246.pdfRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Phase 2: Investigation of Leading Indicators for Systems Engineering Effectiveness in Model-Centric Programs
Rhodes, Donna H. (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2021-08); MIT-SE-21-242.pdfThis technical report summarizes the work conducted by Massachusetts Institute of Technology under contract award HQ0034-20-1-0008 during the performance period May 22, 2020 – July 31, 2021. Digital engineering transformation ... -
Adapting Systems Engineering Leading Indicators to the Digital Engineering & Management Paradigm
Rhodes, Donna H.; Rebentisch, Eric; Moulton, Allen (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2021-05-10); SYM-AM-21-136Digital engineering transformation changes the practice of systems engineering, and drives the need to re-examine how engineering effectiveness is measured and assessed. Early engineering metrics were primarily lagging ... -
Investigation of Leading Indicators for Systems Engineering Effectiveness in Model-Centric Programs
Rhodes, Donna H.; Rebentisch, Eric; Moulton, Allen (Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2021-05-19); SYM-AM-21-136Digital engineering transformation changes the practice of systems engineering, and drives the need to re-examine how engineering effectiveness is measured and assessed. Early engineering metrics were primarily lagging ...