Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLin, Kyle Y.
dc.contributor.authorWashburn, Alan R.
dc.date2010
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-14T17:04:26Z
dc.date.available2012-03-14T17:04:26Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/768
dc.description.abstractThis report examines two forms of decoy that may arise in warfare involving improvised explosive devices (IEDs). The first is a fake IED, which costs less than a real IED and wastes the time of route-clearing patrols that investigate it. The second is an understaffed surveillance tower, which may provide some deterrence to insurgent activities, as from the outside the tower appears to be fully operational. For each form of decoy, we formulate mathematical models to study the optimal strategies for both the insurgents and the government forces. We use numerical examples to demonstrate our models, and to point out the situations when these decoys may play a significant role in IED warfare.en_US
dc.format.extentvi, 28 p.: ill.;28 cm.en_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.titleThe effect of decoys in IED warfareen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.contributor.corporateNaval Postgraduate School (U.S.)
dc.contributor.corporateJoint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (U.S.)
dc.contributor.departmentOperations Researchen_US
dc.subject.authorGame theoryen_US
dc.identifier.oclcocn664360544
dc.identifier.npsreportNPS-OR-10-007
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record