Should S1000D be required by the Department of Defense?

Blais, Curtis L.; Falby, John S.; McCauley, Michael E.

dc.contributor.author	Blais, Curtis L.
dc.contributor.author	Falby, John S.
dc.contributor.author	McCauley, Michael E.
dc.date	2010
dc.date.accessioned	2012-03-14T17:05:56Z
dc.date.available	2012-03-14T17:05:56Z
dc.date.issued	2010
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10945/823
dc.description.abstract	The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether S1000D, an international specification for technical publications, should be required in Department of Defense (DoD) acquisitions. Based on the information and opinions gathered from nearly 200 participants in the study, we conclude that S1000D should be a required standard for technical publications across the DoD. This action should be taken in conjunction with a program to implement, transition, and promote its success. This program would include a set of critical provisions for DoD to: (1) manage/govern the use of the standard; (2) promote the use of the standard; (3) support adoption and evolution of the standard; and (4) establish and enforce use of the standard.	en_US
dc.format.extent	x, 71 p: ill.;28 cm.	en_US
dc.publisher	Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School	en_US
dc.rights	This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, is not copyrighted in the U.S.	en_US
dc.title	Should S1000D be required by the Department of Defense?	en_US
dc.type	Technical Report	en_US
dc.contributor.corporate	Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness
dc.contributor.corporate	Naval Postgraduate School
dc.contributor.department	MOVES Institute
dc.description.funder	Contract number: XJ9H5R9XT376MP.	en_US
dc.identifier.oclc	ocn663976308
dc.identifier.npsreport	NPS-MV-10-002
dc.description.distributionstatement	Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.