Improving nominal reliability confidence bounds using coverage probabilities generated through Monte Carlo simulation and illustrated by military application
Loading...
Authors
Halverson, Jon L.
Subjects
Advisors
Olwell, David H.
Date of Issue
2000-09
Date
September, 2000
Publisher
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Language
en_US
Abstract
Estimating the failure time of a product with a high degree of confidence is a difficult endeavor. Clearly, if the product is inexpensive and fails quickly, extensive tests can be run to make prediction more accurate. When the item under scrutiny is expensive, not prone to failure, or both, calculating accurate estimates and confidence bounds (CBs) becomes more difficult. Furthermore, many methods currently in use are prone to error, sometimes making a critical part appear more reliable than it actually is. Much of our military uses end-items that fall into this category. The lives of our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines often depend on accurate reliability estimates for the equipment and weapons they work on every day. This thesis first introduces reliability and the common techniques for measuring it. Secondly, it shows that these estimates are often biased. Next, this bias is quantified using Monte Carlo simulation and corrected through simple tables and equations. The tables and equations can be used to map nominal confidence bounds to actual confidence bounds. Lastly, these results are applied to a Marine Corps program and a test run at a major automotive brake system manufacturer. These examples will illustrate the impact of uncorrected bias and what can be done to correct it.
Type
Thesis
Description
Series/Report No
Department
Organization
Identifiers
NPS Report Number
Sponsors
Funder
Format
xx, 56 p.;28 cm.
Citation
Distribution Statement
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.