Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEaton, Donald R.
dc.contributor.advisorFranck, Raymond E.
dc.contributor.advisorKang, Keebom
dc.contributor.advisorSan Miguel, Joe G.
dc.contributor.authorBlaxton, Allen C.
dc.contributor.authorFay, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Cheryl M.
dc.contributor.authorZuchristian, Christopher M.
dc.dateJune 2003
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-22T15:30:23Z
dc.date.available2012-08-22T15:30:23Z
dc.date.issued2003-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/9854
dc.descriptionMBA Professional Reporten_US
dc.description.abstractAccording to I and L, HQMC, the Marine Corps needs to re-evaluate current operational requirements for engineer construction equipment. Acquisition and force allocation levels for equipment have remained essentially at constant 1970's, Cold War levels. Because acquisition and allocation levels haven't changed at the same rate as personnel, there is a perception that much of the existing equipment is unnecessary. Impacts for supporting too much equipment are decreased readiness, increased maintenance requirements, and increased O and M costs. The objective of our MBA project is to identify the correct quantity of construction equipment required to support the future needs of the USMC, focusing on unit training and Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) deployment cycles. This study will also evaluate the cost effectiveness of various alternatives for supplying the right amount and mix of CE to support contingencies via the civilian industrial base (lease/purchase decision factors, as well as domestic/international supplier issues). Our group will perform a review of USMC CE acquisition history to determine how the Marines have procured engineer equipment. Additionally, we will determine the annual volume of equipment that has been purchased or otherwise procured from industrial sources and the expected life cycle of existing equipment owned by the Marine Corps. With this information, we will assess the ability and willingness of suppliers worldwide to provide needed equipment for replacement of expired gear or in support of emergent contingencies. Our objectives are to determine the correct amount and mix of construction equipment to maintain at the Battalion level and to identify some cost effective alternatives for supporting battalion operations and training requirements.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://archive.org/details/annalysisofusmch109459854
dc.format.extentxvi, 132 p. : ill. (some col.)en_US
dc.format.extent28 cm.en_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.en_US
dc.subject.lcshMaterials management.en_US
dc.titleAn analysis of USMC heavy construction equipment (HCE) requirementsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentGraduate School of Business & Public Policy (GSBPP)
dc.subject.authorEngineer Equipmenten_US
dc.subject.authorConstruction Equipmenten_US
dc.subject.authorLogisticsen_US
dc.subject.authorMaterial Managementen_US
dc.subject.authorInventory Reductionen_US
dc.subject.authorLife Cycle Costen_US
dc.subject.authorLife Cycle Management;en_US
dc.description.serviceMajor, United States Marine Corpsen_US
dc.description.serviceLieutenant Commander(s), United States Navyen_US
etd.thesisdegree.nameMaster of Business Administrationen_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineBusiness Administrationen_US
etd.thesisdegree.grantorNaval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record