Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHatch, Bill
dc.contributor.advisorSimon, Cary
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Matthew P.
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-14T17:35:44Z
dc.date.available2012-03-14T17:35:44Z
dc.date.issued2006-09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/2616
dc.description.abstractThis research was conducted in association with Naval Warfare Development Command (NWDC) requests to update Unmanned Vehicle Tactical Memorandum TM-3-22- 5-SW. The research identified and discussed significant USV manning considerations such as source ratings and manpower qualities to pilot, operate sensors, support USV electronics, and the manpower implications associated with various weapons systems alternatives. In addition, this research described several existing and notional USV tactics, as well as a discussion about the existing N75 and N76 primary and secondary mission areas USV operations may support. The methodology consisted of a literature review of USV test reports; USV Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration briefs; USV Concept of Operations; fleet lessons learned; the USV tactical memorandum; Naval manpower instructions, and manuals; Weapons Tactical, Field, and Training Manuals; Military Utility Assessments; search of books, magazines, and manpower theses. The research found that determining manpower qualities and standard operating procedures will remain a dynamic process until USV equipment is standardized. The research also showed USV launch and recovery is more manpower intensive than that of a standard RHIB. Gunners Mates (GM) and Aviation Ordnancemen (AO) are potential source ratings to support USV Hellfire and Javelin missile modules. The Navy should establish a GM Navy Enlisted Classification (NEC) to support Hellfire and Javelin or add these weapons to existing GM NECs. Electronics Technicians (ET), Fire Controlmen (FC), and Fire Control Technicians (FT) are potential source ratings for USV electrical/electronic support. FC and FT are potential source ratings to support the Remote Operated Small Arms Mount. This research found additional warfighting capabilities can be gained by equipping surface warfare vessels with USV's without any negative effects to primary or secondary warfare missions. Overall, USVs enhanced designed capabilities of Naval warships and directly support a capabilities based Navy.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://archive.org/details/analysisofoperat109452616
dc.format.extentxviii, 74 p. : col. ill. ;en_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.subject.lcshManpoweren_US
dc.subject.lcshWeaponsen_US
dc.subject.lcshElectronicsen_US
dc.subject.lcshShipsen_US
dc.subject.lcshElectronic techniciansen_US
dc.subject.lcshNaval battlesen_US
dc.subject.lcshWeapons systemsen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of operational manning requirements and deployment procedures for unmanned surface vehicles aboard U.S. Navy shipsen_US
dc.title.alternativeOperational manning considerations for Spartan Scout and Sea Fox unmanned surface vehicles (USV)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.corporateNaval Postgraduate School
dc.contributor.schoolGraduate School of Business and Public Policy (GSBPP)
dc.identifier.oclc73523901
etd.thesisdegree.nameM.A.en_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineBusiness Administrationen_US
etd.verifiednoen_US
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record