Post-award debriefing of unsuccessful offerors - installation level
dc.contributor.advisor | Desbrow, Sandra M. | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Adams, Rebecca J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cooper, James W. | |
dc.date | June 1995 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-04-29T22:50:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-04-29T22:50:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1995-06 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10945/31425 | |
dc.description.abstract | When a contractor expends a great deal of time and expense to prepare a proposal in response to a high-dollar Government Request for Proposals and award of the resultant contract is made to another contractor, the unsuccessful offeror will often protest since the post-award debriefing does not satisfy his concerns as to why his was not the best offer. This thesis reviews the current written guidance pertaining to post-award debriefings, looks at the current installation level debriefing process and recommends ways to improve debriefings. Results of a questionnaire sent to installation contracting officers and offerors who contract with them indicate: the current debriefing process is not working as well as it should; the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) should help improve the debrief; and further improvements are possible. Some of the thesis' recommendations are: make the post-award debrief an integral part of the process for key technical personnel; give weaknesses, in writing, to the unsuccessful offerors with notification of award; if requested, release all information that the contractor would receive under protest discovery procedures; provide analytical training for contracting officers; use videos and other types of training on "how not to" and "how to" conduct a post-award debriefing. | en_US |
dc.description.uri | http://archive.org/details/postawarddebrief1094531425 | |
dc.format.extent | 71 p. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School | en_US |
dc.rights | This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States. | en_US |
dc.title | Post-award debriefing of unsuccessful offerors - installation level | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Management | |
dc.description.funder | NA | en_US |
dc.description.recognition | NA | en_US |
dc.description.service | U.S. Army (USA) author | en_US |
etd.thesisdegree.name | M.S. in Management | en_US |
etd.thesisdegree.level | Masters | en_US |
etd.thesisdegree.discipline | Management | en_US |
etd.thesisdegree.grantor | Naval Postgraduate School | en_US |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
1. Thesis and Dissertation Collection, all items
Publicly releasable NPS Theses, Dissertations, MBA Professional Reports, Joint Applied Projects, Systems Engineering Project Reports and other NPS degree-earning written works.