Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEoyang, Carson K.
dc.date1979-05
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-29T23:28:04Z
dc.date.available2013-04-29T23:28:04Z
dc.date.issued1979-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/31851
dc.descriptionThe views herein are solely the responsibility of the author and do not represent the official position of the U.S. Navy, the Naval Postgraduate School or the Department of Administrative Sciences.en_US
dc.description.abstractA conceptual framework for assessing and choosing among alternative OD interventions is presented. The method is based upon recognition that the welfare of individuals, work groups, and the total organization are not always positively correlated. A number of examples illustrates the various trade-offs and interactions among these independent welfare considerations. A specific heuristic method for choosing among alternative interventions is presented. Finally several propositions stimulated by this approach are suggested.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Human Resource Management Research Program, Department of Administrative Sciencesen_US
dc.description.urihttp://archive.org/details/qualitativeinter36eoya
dc.format.extent28, 8 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.en_US
dc.subject.lcshManagement scienceen_US
dc.titleQualitative intervention assessment: A conceptual heuristic for OD choiceen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.identifier.npsreportWorking Paper Series
dc.identifier.npsreportunnumbered


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record