Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorOlwell, David
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Sylvester H.
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-14T17:47:20Z
dc.date.available2012-03-14T17:47:20Z
dc.date.issued2002-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/5957
dc.description.abstractThis thesis reduces wasted Reserve training seats by one-fourth, improving resource use and increasing readiness. The Army Reserve currently uses approximately 80% of its scheduled Initial Entry Training seats each year (wasting over 3000 seats for soldiers assigned to Troop Program Units). Reasons include misalignment of Basic Combat Training with follow-on Advanced Individual Training, scheduling too many seats during a period when targeted trainees are not available for training, and limited training capacity for specific specialties that units require for improved readiness. The Office of the Chief, Army Reserve Personnel Division negotiates with other Army components in the Training Resource Arbitration Panel to make adjustments to schedules of the Army Training Requirements and Resources System. Input from Recruiting Command and expert judgment is inadequate. This thesis allocates Army Reserve seats among competing needs of Army components and within available resources to increase seat utilization, thus increasing readiness. We validate the model by comparing historical training with model results and use these results to establish feasible training schedules to meet future goals and respond to readiness, recruiting and retention in the Army Reserve. This model provides a Reserve training schedule for FY 03 that optimally allocates funded training resources to improve unit readiness, achieves fiscal year goals established by the Structure Manning Decision Review, and eliminates mismatches between basic and advanced training that caused lost training resources in the past. The Army Reserve can set various goals and establish a schedule that remains responsive to historical starts. When specialty readiness prioritization occurs, users will simply establish weights for these priorities as part of the input data. This model requires data inputs from the Army Training Requirements and Resources System and the Total Army Personnel Database - Reserve. We expect a reduction in training seat loss from 20% to approximately 15%. This means that over 15,000 Reserve soldiers will become specialty qualified during FY 03 versus 13,000, improving readiness in Troop Program Units. The Personnel Division should implement this model to help in the Training Resource Arbitration Panel process.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://archive.org/details/armyreservetrain109455957
dc.format.extentxxii, 81 p. : ill. ;en_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.en_US
dc.subject.lcshLinear programmingen_US
dc.subject.lcshOperations researchen_US
dc.titleArmy Reserve training seat allocationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.secondreaderButtrey, Samuel E.
dc.contributor.departmentOperations research
dc.subject.authorOptimizationen_US
dc.subject.authorLinear Programmingen_US
dc.subject.authorGAMSen_US
dc.subject.authorOperations Researchen_US
dc.subject.authorSchedulingen_US
dc.subject.authorTrainingen_US
dc.description.serviceMajor, United States Army Reserveen_US
etd.thesisdegree.nameM.S. in Operations Researchen_US
etd.thesisdegree.levelMastersen_US
etd.thesisdegree.disciplineOperations Researchen_US
etd.thesisdegree.grantorNaval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record