Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWirtz, James
dc.date2001
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-14T17:02:16Z
dc.date.available2012-03-14T17:02:16Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/658
dc.description.abstractSince the end of the Cold war, naval analysts and strategist have faced a crisis. On the one hand, they are well versed with the enduring concepts of strategy, intelligence and the procedures and lessons generated by nearly fifty years of Cold War. On the other hand, there is a widespread notion that traditional ways of doing business undermine new, more coperative opportunities that have arisen in international politics since 1989. This critcism is reflected in attempts at New Thinking which places societal, environmental and even Utopian solutions to military and intelligence problems ahead of traditional concepts of strategy. At the same time, events like the Gulf War, Bosnia, Kosovo, Desert Fox and intelligence surprises (Indian and Pakistan nuclear testing) demonstrate a mastery of the principles of intelligence and strategy are the conerstone of U.S. foreign and defence policy.-- Report documentation page.en_US
dc.format.extent1 v. (various pagings): ill.;28 cm.en_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.titleStrategy in the contemporary worlden_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.contributor.corporateNaval Postgraduate School (U.S.): Institute for Joint Warfare Analysis.
dc.contributor.schoolInstitute for Joint Warfare Analysis
dc.subject.authorNational security.en_US
dc.subject.authorStrategy.en_US
dc.description.funderONR# N001400WR20307.en_US
dc.identifier.oclcocm299571143
dc.identifier.npsreportNPS-IJWA-01-005
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record