Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCaudle, Sharon
dc.date2008-10
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-03T16:26:49Z
dc.date.available2013-01-03T16:26:49Z
dc.date.issued2008-10-00
dc.identifier.citationHomeland Security Affairs (October 2008), v.4 no.3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10945/25042
dc.descriptionThis article appeared in Homeland Security Affairs (October 2008), v.4 no.3en_US
dc.description.abstractStarting in the early 1990s, Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton advocated a 'balanced scorecard' translating an organization's mission and existing business strategy into specific strategic objectives that could be linked in cause and effect relationships and measured operationally. The balanced scorecard stressed drivers of future organizational performance -- capabilities, resources, and business processes -- and the outcome results of those drivers. This article describes and illustrates the balanced scorecard as a tool to better implement homeland security strategies.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.publisherCenter for Homeland Defense and Securityen_US
dc.rightsThe copyright of all articles published in Homeland Security Affairs rests with the author[s] of the articles. Any commercial use of Homeland Security Affairs or the articles published herein is expressly prohibited without the written consent of the copyright holder. Anyone can copy, distribute, or reuse these articles as long as the author and original source are properly cited.en_US
dc.titleBalanced Scorecard: A Strategic Tool in Implementing Homeland Security Strategiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.distributionstatementApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record