An Alternative Approach to the Lottery Method in Utility Theory for Game Theory
dc.contributor.author | Fox, William P. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-10T21:05:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-10T21:05:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-05-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Fox, W.P. (2015) An Alternative Approach to the Lottery Method in Utility Theory for Game Theory. American Journal of Operations Research, 5, 199-208. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10945/61904 | |
dc.description | The article of record as published may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajor.2015.53016 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In game theory, in order to properly use mixed strategies, equalizing strategies or the Nash arbitration method, we require cardinal payoffs. We present an alternative method to the possible tedious lottery method of von Neumann and Morgenstern to change ordinal values into cardinal values using the analytical hierarchy process. We suggest using Saaty’s pairwise comparison with combined strategies as criteria for players involved in a repetitive game. We present and illustrate a methodology for moving from ordinal payoffs to cardinal payoffs. We summarize the impact on how the solutions are achieved. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 10 p. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Scientific Research Publishing | en_US |
dc.rights | This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States. | en_US |
dc.title | An Alternative Approach to the Lottery Method in Utility Theory for Game Theory | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.contributor.corporate | Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.) | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Defense Analysis (DA) | en_US |
dc.subject.author | Analytical Hierarchy Process | en_US |
dc.subject.author | Cardinal Utility | en_US |
dc.subject.author | Game Theory | en_US |
dc.subject.author | Payoff Matrix | en_US |