Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPalin, Philip
dc.contributor.authorHall, Steven
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Ted
dc.contributor.authorBaldwin, Craig
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-04T19:31:59Z
dc.date.available2012-06-04T19:31:59Z
dc.date.issued2012-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/7015
dc.description.abstractDeterrence displaces or delays unwanted behavior. More ambitiously, deterrence aims to permanently discourage an individual or individuals from such behavior. It operates through the prospect of pain or pleasure. Fear of future pain and hope of future pleasure influence choices, habits, and predilections. Individuals seek to avoid pain and maximize pleasure. Expectations of pain and pleasure will vary, but given an individual’s or group’s specific sensibilities a pattern of pain-minimization and pleasure-maximization persists. An effective deterrence strategy rewards “good behavior” and punishes “bad behavior.” Coast Guard deterrence effectiveness is anchored in a multifaceted approach to safety, stewardship, and security in maritime communities. The Coast Guard is also effective in customizing its approach to particular communities or sub-groups within a community to deter unwanted behavior. However, the Coast Guard has not adopted an explicit data-informed strategy of deterrence. As a result Coast Guard practice and outcomes are uneven, measurement is not possible, and continual improvement is accordingly difficult. The effectiveness of Coast Guard practice is limited by the absence of an organizing theory, systematic process, and measures of performance. Based on the long-time Coast Guard practice of deterrence observed, this study has identified several complementary theories of psychology, sociology, and economics that may be applied to develop a deterrence strategy. Specifically, the theories of Becker, Ostrom, and Kahneman provide a theoretical foundation for a proposed strategy of deterrence and a methodology/tool proposed here called the Deterrence Integration Modeling Environment (DIME). DIME combines these theories with Coast Guard practice and data-informed technology to bridge the gap between theory and operations. Based on these findings, this study recommends the Coast Guard design and build a DIME proof-of-concept system to capture and manage “big data” to advance the new strategy of deterrence.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted.en_US
dc.subjectDeterrenceen_US
dc.subjectDeterrent impacten_US
dc.subjectProspecten_US
dc.subjectTheoryen_US
dc.titleDeterrence and the United States Coast Guard: enhancing current practice with performance measuresen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Homeland Defense and Security
dc.identifier.npsreportUDI# 1181


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record