Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLyons, Nancy
dc.contributor.authorWienhoff, Nathan
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-30T18:23:48Z
dc.date.available2017-05-30T18:23:48Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10945/53485
dc.description.abstractThis research explores the disparities between the DA ethics training objectives versus the subjectivity involved in applying ethical principles to decision-making. We analyze the DA ethics training courses, policies, and procedures. The project explores the distinctions between ethics, values, integrity, standards of conduct, and morality as they relate to clearly defined ethics rules and scenarios where ethical laws or policies may be ambiguous or absent. The research methodology includes a comparative analysis of the Joint Ethics Regulation (JER), the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), and DA ethics training objectives. We also provide an analysis of adjudicated cases involving ethical failures to address changes needed in DA training to ensure that future leaders understand their ethical responsibilities and standards of conduct.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNaval Postgraduate School Acquisition Research Programen_US
dc.publisherMonterey, California. Naval Postgraduate Schoolen_US
dc.rightsThis publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States.en_US
dc.titleAn Analysis of Ethics Laws, Compliance with Ethical Standards, and Ethical Core Competency within the Department of the Armyen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
dc.identifier.npsreportNPS-AM-16-142


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record